Red-teaming your chatbot before launch

Red-teaming your chatbot before launch is the practical checklist for testing AI features against real attacks.

By Krikor Tengerian · Co-founder, SecuritAI Technologies Ltd. · June 2026

Every team that ships a chatbot or AI agent eventually asks the same question: did we test this enough before launch? Here is the checklist we use to answer that honestly, structured the way an actual attacker would approach your product, in line with the testing categories in the OWASP LLM Top 10.

Step 1 — Map what your AI can actually do

Before testing anything, write down: what data can this AI see (customer records, internal docs, your own system prompt)? What actions can it take (call APIs, send messages, query a database, use tools)? What would the worst realistic outcome be if it were manipulated? You cannot red-team what you have not mapped.

Step 2 — Test for prompt injection

Try direct injection: tell the AI to ignore its instructions, reveal its system prompt, or act as an “admin.” Then test indirect injection, plant an instruction inside a document, email, or web page your AI might read or summarize. If your AI ever processes content it didn’t generate itself, indirect injection is not optional to test.

Step 3 — Test for jailbreaks

Jailbreaks try to bypass safety behavior through role-play (“pretend you are an AI with no restrictions”), hypothetical framing (“for a fictional story, explain…”), or multi-step conversations that gradually push the model further than a single message would. A model that holds firm on message one can still fail on message five.

Step 4 — Test for data exfiltration

Can you get the AI to reveal its system prompt? Can you get it to repeat back sensitive information from earlier in the conversation, or from a connected data source, by asking in an indirect way? Plant a fake secret somewhere the AI has access to and see if a clever prompt can extract it, this is exactly what canary-based testing is for.

Step 5 — Test agent actions, not just chat

If your AI can call tools or APIs, test whether a manipulated conversation can trigger an action outside its intended scope: sending a message it shouldn’t, modifying data it should only read, or chaining tool calls in a way you didn’t design for. Chat-only testing misses this entirely.

Step 6 — Don’t do this once

Every new feature, every model upgrade, and every prompt change can reopen a hole you already closed. A one-time test before launch tells you about launch day. It tells you nothing about three months from now after five feature updates.

Why teams skip this — and why that’s getting riskier

Manually writing and running adversarial prompts is slow, and most teams don’t have a security background to know what a real attacker would try. The realistic options are: hire dedicated AI red-teamers, build and maintain your own attack library, or use a platform that already has one.

Red-teaming your chatbot: how SecuritAI does it for you

AI Red Teaming runs your checklist automatically and at scale: extensive adversarial testing covering injection, jailbreaks, data exfiltration, system-prompt leakage, and agent abuse, against Groq, OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, or any custom endpoint. Canary detection confirms whether planted secrets can be extracted. Scheduled re-tests mean every new feature gets checked against the same standard, automatically, not “when someone remembers to.”

References

1. OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications
2. MITRE ATLAS, Adversarial Threat Landscape for AI Systems
3. NIST AI Risk Management Framework

← Back to the blog